Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:22:12 +0100 From: Koop Mast <kwm@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.gstreamer.mk ports/devel/gstreamer-plugins-gconf Makefile ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins Makefile Makefile.common pkg-plist Message-ID: <1111342932.1434.27.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <423DB41C.1020603@FreeBSD.org> References: <200503201601.j2KG1gXb019071@repoman.freebsd.org> <423DA870.7070702@FreeBSD.org> <1111338375.1434.11.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> <423DB41C.1020603@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-BOUY5eGI4H3OWsSXP1Ir Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op zo, 20-03-2005 te 12:34 -0500, schreef Adam Weinberger: > Koop Mast wrote: > > Op zo, 20-03-2005 te 11:44 -0500, schreef Adam Weinberger: > >=20 > >>Koop Mast wrote: > >> > >>>kwm 2005-03-20 16:01:42 UTC > >>> > >>> FreeBSD ports repository > >>> > >>> Modified files: > >>> Mk bsd.gstreamer.mk=20 > >>> multimedia/gstreamer-plugins Makefile Makefile.common=20 > >>> pkg-plist=20 > >>> Added files: > >>> devel/gstreamer-plugins-gconf Makefile=20 > >>> Log: > >>> Slit off gstreamer gconf stuff in a seperate port. > >>> =20 > >>> Requested by: lofi > >>> Approved by: maintainer (implicit) > >> > >>Why? > >> > >>Is this separation for the benefit of KDE ports, for when KDE has=20 > >>support for gstreamer backend? > >=20 > >=20 > > Primarily yes. I think I had another Reason but I can't remember. > >=20 > >=20 > >>Also, does this need to be set manually, or could it just be inferred? > >=20 > >=20 > > This I something that also entered my brain when I hit commit. > > Its enabled by USE_GSTREAMER=3Dgconf.=20 > >=20 > > To be honest I have no idea what inferred in this context means. >=20 > What I was getting at is that if a port has a dependency on=20 > gstreamer-plugins, and a dependency on gconf, the dependency on=20 > gstreamer-plugins-gconf should be implied. >=20 > # Adam Thats a good point, but not all ports that depend on gst-plug and Gconf need gstreamer-plug-gconf.=20 Lets take for example gnomecontrolcenter2. It depends on gstreamer-plug and on Gconf, but it doesn't require gst-plug-gconf. So I think this is the best solution for the moment. Koop --=-BOUY5eGI4H3OWsSXP1Ir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCPb9UaHm3zflUJtoRAprIAKCxrtOvWC9Mo/uCZRIUJ+UABrcrswCfeQdT VYLLXoUqQh3aQOP/gWMnDiY= =Q5UQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BOUY5eGI4H3OWsSXP1Ir--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1111342932.1434.27.camel>