Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:32:12 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Does building current on 2.2.x still work? 
Message-ID:  <199807230632.AAA07851@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Jul 1998 15:32:59 %2B1000." <199807230532.PAA01812@cimlogic.com.au> 
References:  <199807230532.PAA01812@cimlogic.com.au>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199807230532.PAA01812@cimlogic.com.au> John Birrell writes:
: Without the -m argument, make grabs the installed sys.mk and if this is
: the thing that needs to be upgraded, I can't see how it can "do the
: right thing". Bruce seems to think that it is possible to fix src/Makefile.
: I don't see how, though. [I'm sounding like a broken record, so I'd better
: shut up now 8-) ]

I have a silly question.  Looking at src/Makefile, I see:

.if (!make(world)) && (!make(buildworld)) && (!make(installworld))
.MAKEFLAGS:=	-m ${.CURDIR}/share/mk ${.MAKEFLAGS}
.endif

Why the if?  Why wouldn't you want to use share/mk always for make
*world?

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807230632.AAA07851>