Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 2006 18:38:04 +0200
From:      Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl
Message-ID:  <1147451884.670.33.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4464B6D2.5070308@freebsd.org>
References:  <200605120254.k4C2s3BS052028@repoman.freebsd.org> <4464020F.3000609@freebsd.org> <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org> <20060512130211.GA89089@submonkey.net> <4464AFF4.8030506@freebsd.org> <4464B6D2.5070308@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:24 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:41:50AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> >>>> If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>>>> andre       2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  FreeBSD doc repository (src committer)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Modified files:
> >>>>>    en                   index.xsl 
> >>>>>  Log:
> >>>>>  Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of 
> >>>>>  architectures
> >>>>>  a bit.
> >>>> I wonder if the !alpha part was a little premature?  Yes, the alpha
> >>>> kernel bits are gone from HEAD, but they're still around on RELENG_5 and
> >>>> RELENG_6, and we're still planning to do releases from both of those
> >>>> codelines.  The first release that won't include alpha will be 7.0, and
> >>>> its release cycle doesn't even *start* for over a year.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just a thought...
> >>> There are like two remaining Alpha users and we most likely won't gain
> >>> any new ones in the foreseeable future. Though we are compiling releases
> >>> according to jhb it isn't even clear they actually work on Alpha.  It's
> >>> not actively maintained anymore.  It really has left the building and there
> >>> is no point in advertising it on our homepage instead of on some random
> >>> tombstone somewhere out in the past architectures graveyard.
> >> That's as may be, but you really should have gotten approval from a doc
> >> committer for this commit.  Bruce is one, he disagrees, you should back
> >> it out.
> > 
> > Just for the record, I didn't even notice what set of commit bits andre
> > has, and I would have sent exactly the same comment even if he was a
> > member of doceng@ or core@.  :-)
> 
> I'm sorry for the drive-by commit to index.xsl and not contacting doceng@
> prior to making this change. I just partly backed out the change by readding
> Alpha/AXP.

Thanks Andre. :)

-- 
Joel




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1147451884.670.33.camel>