Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:42 +0000 From: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/gd marked as broken? Message-ID: <dd7fa8d4-45b3-3242-9757-9e852931619a@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <9872898a-e35d-b54b-1094-a1d42323cac8@FreeBSD.org> References: <31afe4b6-a935-9908-1291-62a72c57668d@gjunka.com> <5ec06b5f-4628-8c0f-a8d8-825e20aa74c5@utanet.at> <9872898a-e35d-b54b-1094-a1d42323cac8@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/08/2016 11:40, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 20/08/2016 9:17 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >> Only WEBP is broken, make sure the option is set to off. > Do you think the (error) messaging be improved to make it more obvious > to users what's the fail condition is, but more importantly, also what > they should/could do about it? > > The current message does neither. > > ./koobs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Wait, so what it actually means that the port is marked as broken? I understood that the maintainer marked the port as broken because it discovered that the port doesn't compile because of circular dependency? Who then actually marked the port as broken? Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dd7fa8d4-45b3-3242-9757-9e852931619a>