Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 05:17:16 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: alk@pobox.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nice little kernel task for somebody Message-ID: <3720D54C.70CDDF13@newsguy.com> References: <14112.52429.575986.913523@avalon.east>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Kimball wrote: > > : Against that there is a general Linuxism/Kitchen-Sink feeling. > > Think of this case as a plan9-ism. I think nothing of it... My opinions wouldn't matter a tiny little bit. :-) Still, after reading the Samba reply to the Microsoft, err, Mindcraft NTvsLinus benchmark, and the comments on tuning through /proc, I have to say I'd feel disgusted to have something like that on FreeBSD. It gave a whole new meaning to the word "arcane". Still, I'm against process privacy. We ought to be able to know anything about how a process is using *our* (the system's) resources. At least until we get proper compartimentalized security, which a number of people few is very un-Unix-like. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3720D54C.70CDDF13>