Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
Cc:        re@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 64 bit quantities in statfs ?
Message-ID:  <200308251542.h7PFgXIV093334@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030824230439.GA4954@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
References:  <200308181854.h7IIshJg098625@apollo.backplane.com> <20030824230439.GA4954@HAL9000.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:04:40 -0700, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> said:

> Yep, looks broken.  In the POSIX standard, the functionality of
> statfs() is provided by statvfs(), so implementing the latter may
> be a way out that doesn't involve breaking any ABIs.

statfs() is a lot more useful interface than statvfs().  I'd like to
keep statvfs() as the ``standard'' interface, rather than extending it
to cover all of the information that statfs() has.

In order to grow statfs() we need to rev libc.  It might be
appropriate to do that in the 5.2 time frame, if we are still
anticipating that 5.2 will be the -stable crossover point.  RE team?

-GAWollman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200308251542.h7PFgXIV093334>