Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 00:55:57 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld broken after installworld Message-ID: <20030804215557.GJ1445@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030804214444.GA55421@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030804195135.0562a9a2.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030804114723.GB39384@sunbay.com> <20030804223833.6c9a6718.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030804134636.GA39138@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804135713.GA39289@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804140332.GA39367@nagual.pp.ru> <20030804141858.GB60105@sunbay.com> <xzpu18xp7wn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030804203219.GF1445@sunbay.com> <20030804214444.GA55421@nagual.pp.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:44:44AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 23:32:19 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > I think we've now reached the agreement with Andrey that > > a more correct, safe, and portable [sic] construct would > > be "LC_ALL=C tr [:lower:] [:upper:]". It works the same > > in any non-broken operating system and with any locale. > > We need to say, construct for what? If for lower->upper replacing inside > ASCII only, "LC_ALL=C tr [a-z] [A-Z]" is most portable because some tr > implementations even not understand [:class:] but some other have SysV-ism > to specify ranges in the [], against what POSIX says. But I think that > "LC_ALL=C tr a-z A-Z" is better middle point here because not teach user > to incorrect syntax from the scripts. > Agreed. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/LtZtUkv4P6juNwoRAlAxAJ9QMjVt/yShinOw22t7rwHQIYN/3gCeN+Q/ txdCMH/5lSXdU7jBNDAmKDs= =/dBN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030804215557.GJ1445>