Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:45:16 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what next for the pkg_install rewrite Message-ID: <20100819214516.GD15775@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <4C6DA0FA.7080203@DataIX.net> References: <20100819143830.GJ35140@azathoth.lan> <AANLkTimY=FJas-oXkWwO07QtaD%2BGrLockgJ_SZQJ7UHM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimhh2vOtXUb-frzWcZmANWyEC7oPtTgepzvOtSB@mail.gmail.com> <4C6DA0FA.7080203@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Jeu 19 aoû 10 à 23:24:10 +0200, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> écrivait : > As well I would also like to see something done about packages that > don't need to be upgraded because they are neither platform or arch > dependent but yet they are upgraded due to being listed as a dependent > of another port that needs to be upgraded. For example any package that > may be type shell script does not need updating due to a major lib > version bump of for say libpng. For this purpose, it's already possible to check if the port set NO_BUILD. Regards, -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100819214516.GD15775>