Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:12:07 +0000 From: Darren Reed <darrenr@hub.freebsd.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: truss status Message-ID: <20061025171207.GA94866@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200607241819.08831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200607210845.k6L8j0Ep026008@repoman.freebsd.org> <200607241336.29993.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060724072513.GB727@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200607241819.08831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:18:36PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2006 16:55, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-Jul-24 13:36:19 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > >Ktrace is almost useless "out of the box" because for any non-trivial > > >operation you run out of requests. > > > > Some changes were made to improve this and this problem has mostly > > gone away. > > Ahh nice! > On a related note, do you think it would be possible to allow ktrace to use > pipes? Have a look at NetBSD, it has something like this...although it is not without issues as ktrace doesn't stop the program to prevent missing events due to the buffer not being drained quickly enough. Darren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061025171207.GA94866>