Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:01:30 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "FreeBSD Chat" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? Message-ID: <058101c28e7c$80d421b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20021116232242.S23359-100000@hub.org><04f801c28e20$0a3665b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DD7CF81.7030407@cream.org> <056001c28e60$2af21cf0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <1037560276.1094.19.camel@skalman.campus.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mattias writes: > You simply can't stresstest to the point > that customers won't find problems anyway. They should not be seeing problems every 48 hours, as has been indicated here. > That is why the closed source companies have > betatesters and releases betas to the public. Beta testers agree to put up with whatever bugs arise. Often they agree not to use beta software in critical production as well, or at least discharge the vendor from responsibility if they do. > That is realy not an open vs closed source > argument at all. It has a lot to do with it. You can do a lot more with programmers who are paid to work on something full-time than with programmers who have to work on things when they have spare moments and inclinations. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?058101c28e7c$80d421b0$0a00000a>