Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:41:34 -0800 From: gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Tree Empty :-( Message-ID: <5755.819409294@westhill.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:41:41 CST." <v02130500acfcd354fe60@[199.183.109.242]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Wackerbarth wrote in message ID <v02130500acfcd354fe60@[199.183.109.242]>: > I just extracted the RELENG_2_1_0 branch from the -cvs tree. > The ports tree comes up totally empty. > I do not think that this is appropriate. > The (-stable) branch which this represents SHOULD have a full tree of > ports, even if they are not as up-to-date as the (-current) branch. Err? The ports tree has NEVER been branched ONCE 'cos it would be a TOTAL nightmare to administrate if we did... hence extracting with RELENG_2_1_0 will get you an empty tree! Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5755.819409294>