Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 09:49:39 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undocumented kernel options... Message-ID: <Mutt.19970214094939.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <9702132244.AA17459@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>; from Marty Leisner on Feb 13, 1997 14:43:52 -0700 References: <199702132102.XAA07991@shadows.aeon.net> <9702132244.AA17459@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Marty Leisner wrote: > > just a basic idea what those are about, and lot of people would be slightly > > more happier... (i assume many would looove to know) > > > > > I have the same opinion...I don't want to have to UTSL. Linux kernel They are just listed there only, but if you look at their names, you'll find that they're really candidates. Most of the stuff seems to serve debugging or testing purposes. Others are simply a little premature since they're not fully working yet (DEVFS_ROOT), so users of it are expected to understand what they're doing anyway. The various SYSVIPC knobs should however be documented. Volunteers needed, preferably folks who're really using SYSVIPC. > configuration has become much nicer with a tk tool, shouldn't freebsd have > one too? Where did you upload your port of it? :-) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970214094939.j>