Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:26:52 -0700
From:      Dan Allen <danallen46@airwired.net>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc:        Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Fatal trap 18
Message-ID:  <B6F7AA11-DD7C-4BD6-938B-46C616B1CC80@airwired.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CD9C669.5070805@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <CB71FE79-F1BE-4134-8536-70EA12A60F8C@airwired.net> <4CD967CB.5090201@icyb.net.ua> <201011091532.13083.jhb@freebsd.org> <4CD9C669.5070805@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 9 Nov 2010, at 3:08 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:

>> The kernel should still not panic if someone disables APIC.
>=20
> 100% agreement - and it shouldn't do that now.

The kernel on my Core Duo machine does not panic with APIC off.  In fact =
it works much better with it off.  The only problem is that I am missing =
one of my two Cores with APIC off!

Dan




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B6F7AA11-DD7C-4BD6-938B-46C616B1CC80>