Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:26:52 -0700 From: Dan Allen <danallen46@airwired.net> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fatal trap 18 Message-ID: <B6F7AA11-DD7C-4BD6-938B-46C616B1CC80@airwired.net> In-Reply-To: <4CD9C669.5070805@icyb.net.ua> References: <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <CB71FE79-F1BE-4134-8536-70EA12A60F8C@airwired.net> <4CD967CB.5090201@icyb.net.ua> <201011091532.13083.jhb@freebsd.org> <4CD9C669.5070805@icyb.net.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 9 Nov 2010, at 3:08 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> The kernel should still not panic if someone disables APIC. > > 100% agreement - and it shouldn't do that now. The kernel on my Core Duo machine does not panic with APIC off. In fact it works much better with it off. The only problem is that I am missing one of my two Cores with APIC off! Danhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B6F7AA11-DD7C-4BD6-938B-46C616B1CC80>
