Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:37:15 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Moving PGP-keys into share/? Message-ID: <20021123223715.GC207@nosferatu.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20021123214754.GF17218@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20021118205344.A44150@sumuk.de> <20021123214754.GF17218@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:47:54PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:53:44PM +0100, Martin Heinen wrote: > > - Move PGP-keys into share/ > > > > With this approach all translations could refer to pgpkeys.ent > > in share/ which circumvents the dependency on the en_US tree. > > Adding new keys has to be done in two places now. Especially > > for the first commits this might be to complicated. > > > > The subject suggests that I'm biased towards the last approach, > > but the second one is easier to implement and much less work. > > What's the best way to do this? > > I'd say by doing this. Marc makes a good point about still depending on > the en_US directory for things like images, but IMHO, that's a bug, and > something we should think about fixing in as painless a way possible. > In the meantime, needlessly replicating that sort of bug seems to me to > be a bad idea. > Ok, let's fix the image problem after 5.0 release, I will have some "freetime" so maybe I could have a look at it :) Since I spent time on a part of that problem, I should finish the job. Marc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE94AMa81T1MWxkgcoRAqnyAJ99TRoUnG00wjVXMGd2cCHfgMhOJQCeOJXv uWIIQbd01xau/AYgN8tlYCg= =P8nz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021123223715.GC207>