Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:42:57 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: <sys/types.h> or not <sys/types.h>? [Was: cvs commit: src/include grp.h] Message-ID: <90116.1014648177@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:32:31 %2B0300." <20020225143231.GC34378@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:32:31 +0300, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > However, the standard expects gid_t to be defined in <unistd.h>, so if > > you just need gid_t, and not prototypes for getgr*(), then that's the > > one to include. > > POSIX reguire gid_t to be specified not only in <sys/types.h> but in > <grp.h> too. Okay. I wasn't disputing making any assertion to the contrary; just pointing out that things like getgroups() don't have to worry about this mess at all. I note that the getgroups(2) manual page disagrees with POSIX as well. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?90116.1014648177>