Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:48:52 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces? Message-ID: <20090602224852.GF15552@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <m2prdmnumt.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <4A257B82.1000701@FreeBSD.org> <EA04BF4C-AE45-4624-9C1B-152FC26405C4@verweg.com> <20090602205125.GA75470@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20090602220624.GD15552@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <m2prdmnumt.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 07:22:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need > > to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically > > configured to do dhcp or anything else[0]. >=20 > such as detected by services such as bind/unbound? The rc system will do nothing with interfaces that don't pass the tests I enumerated so if you don't have an ifconfig_<if> interface there won't be any difference no matter how you set network_interfaces. I'd be rather supprised if bind did anything with interaces that weren't configured with an address (or even up in the case of correctly funtioning drivers). -- Brooks --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKJaxTXY6L6fI4GtQRAgh6AJ9zQvOVNC5NIoQAvjfljCTRAjF4+QCbBiCZ UuhCwCv4FQm3vK9Nvh7CqDY= =+BW4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090602224852.GF15552>