Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jul 1996 23:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Mark Mayo <mark@quickweb.com>
To:        Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
Cc:        Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mitsumi CD-ROM 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.94.960716225604.6321B-100000@scooter.quickweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <199607161917.MAA03813@lestat.nas.nasa.gov>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Jason Thorpe wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Jul 1996 13:56:35 -0400 
>  dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) wrote:
> 
>  > Yeah, when you're spending taxpayers dollars those high-end 'puters
>  > are real nice! :-)
> 
>  > With every purchase, a good consumer makes a value judgement. Frankly
>  > I get more utility out of 5 PCs than I do with 1 of whatever you recommend...
>  > particularly when its my money.
> 
> ...sort of hard to do when I haven't actually recommended anything here 
> on this list.  Actually, I did recommend the purchase of some PCs for our 
> Data Communcations Laboratory.  They're pretty high-end PCs, but that doesn't 
> mean they don't suck.  They were recommended mostly because they're 
> fairly cheap, and they run NetBSD really well.  (Don't try to convert me; 
> I have Sparcs and Alphas in the lab, as well :-)
> 
> It's clear that I'm going to have to justify my comment... One of the big 
> reasons I think PCs suck is because there's so much hackish hardware for 
> them.  SCSI gear is _not_ that much more expensive, and the benefits of 
> using SCSI are far greater than the (small) additional cost.
> 
> If we're going to perpetuate the use of a really lame (IMHO) architecture 
> such as the x86, then we might as well try to break the cycle of hanging 
> hackish hardware off of it.
> 
>  > IDE drives are just fine and darn convenient, considering all most people do
>  > with them is load a distribution or pull something off an archive. And for
>  > $65. a piece for a 6X drive they're practically disposable.
> 
> I fail to see value in "disposable" hardware.  That's just wasteful.  In 
> the long-run, you end up spending _more_ than you did on just one piece 
> of good hardware.

I fail to see why you think any computer hardware isn't disposable. Fact
is, a computer I buy today will be an out-of-date piece of junk 3 years
from now. Peripherals like CD-ROMS might as well be disposable.

What do you do with your old Sun 350's? I use mine as door stops.. I just
replaced a $100,000 AIX server puchased 4 years ago with a $5000 Pentium
Pro 'PC' - and it kicks the IBM's ass around the block!! (thanx to FreeBSD
:-)

Reality check: PC hardware is catching up with 'workstation' hardware at a
remarkable rate - and for 1/10th the price. As far as I see it, this
concept is the REASON behind FreeBSD. It's a UNIX that runs on **PC's**.
If you want 'superior hardware', just chuck out $35,000 for an HP PA-9000
or Dec Alpha. As much as I love my ALpha machine at work, I think
FreeBSD should definately support 'cheap' hardware like IDE CDROMS. They
get the job done, and let more people run a real OS for little cost.

Later,
-Mark

 :%t$sig   -- Oops, thought I was in vi..
-------------------------------------------
| Mark Mayo		mark@quickweb.com |
| C-Soft  	        www.quickweb.com  |
-------------------------------------------



> 
>  -- save the ancient forests - http://www.bayarea.net/~thorpej/forest/ -- 
> Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
> NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
> NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
> Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.94.960716225604.6321B-100000>