Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:06:25 +0100 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today Message-ID: <201004250206.25452.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004201212340.1398@desktop> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004201212340.1398@desktop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 23:15:48 Jeff Roberson wrote: > Hi Folks, > > You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements. > If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with > soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an > unclean shutdown. SUJ may be enabled with tunefs -j enable and disabled > with tunefs -j disable on an unmounted filesystem. It is backwards > compatible with soft-updates with no journal. > > I'm going to do another round of tests and buildworld this afternoon to > verify the diff and then I'm committing to head. This is a very large > feature and fundamentally changes softupdates. Although it has been > extensively tested by many there may be unforseen problems. If you run > into an issue that you think may be suj please email me directly as well > as posting on current as I sometimes miss list email and this will ensure > the quickest response. Should fsck always report that the filesystem has been modified when the journal is skipped, even when no errors are reported? -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201004250206.25452.bruce>