Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:42:02 +0000 From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> To: Andrey Zonov <zont@freebsd.org> Cc: "<net@freebsd.org>" <net@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70451D@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <51177818.2090900@FreeBSD.org> References: <201301221511.02496.jhb@freebsd.org> <50FF06AD.402@networx.ch> <061B4EA5-6A93-48A0-A269-C2C3A3C7E77C@lakerest.net> <201302060746.43736.jhb@freebsd.org> <511292C9.4040307@mu.org> <E6BF2B74-175F-49D9-B480-8941294D2E19@neville-neil.com> <51166019.9040104@mu.org> <CAN6yY1uX__JDEk9dLdJr3pdE1u848jaF_jTn%2B_mrP05bXqm_Pw@mail.gmail.com> <51177818.2090900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 10, 2013, at 11:36, Andrey Zonov <zont@freebsd.org> wrote: > Google made many many TCP tweaks. Increased initial window, small RTO, > enabled ignore after idle and others. They published that, other people > just blindly applied these tunings and the Internet still works. MANY people are experimenting with the changes Google is proposing, in order to evaluate if and how well they work. Sure, some folks may "blindly" apply them, but please don't generalize. Lars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70451D>