Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:42:02 +0000 From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> To: Andrey Zonov <zont@freebsd.org> Cc: "<net@freebsd.org>" <net@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70451D@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <51177818.2090900@FreeBSD.org> References: <201301221511.02496.jhb@freebsd.org> <50FF06AD.402@networx.ch> <061B4EA5-6A93-48A0-A269-C2C3A3C7E77C@lakerest.net> <201302060746.43736.jhb@freebsd.org> <511292C9.4040307@mu.org> <E6BF2B74-175F-49D9-B480-8941294D2E19@neville-neil.com> <51166019.9040104@mu.org> <CAN6yY1uX__JDEk9dLdJr3pdE1u848jaF_jTn%2B_mrP05bXqm_Pw@mail.gmail.com> <51177818.2090900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 10, 2013, at 11:36, Andrey Zonov <zont@freebsd.org> wrote: > Google made many many TCP tweaks. Increased initial window, small RTO, > enabled ignore after idle and others. They published that, other people > just blindly applied these tunings and the Internet still works. MANY people are experimenting with the changes Google is proposing, in orde= r to evaluate if and how well they work. Sure, some folks may "blindly" app= ly them, but please don't generalize. Lars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70451D>