Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 May 2016 17:16:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 209233] [patch] pthread_suspend_all_np races with check_suspend
Message-ID:  <bug-209233-16-Ss32D2scSs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209233-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-209233-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209233

--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Lawrence Esswood from comment #5)
Yes, it is a bug that I left the old test in the loop condition.  I left on=
ly
the check for THR_FLAGS_NEED_SUSPEND there, since it is cleared only on res=
ume.

WRT SIGCANCEL generated after loop exit and before thr_signal_unblock.  The
blocked signal list includes SIGCANCEL, thus the SIGCANCEL signal should be
only delivered after unblock. Then typically we would re-enter _thr_ast() w=
ith
the different set of flags.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209233-16-Ss32D2scSs>