Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:26:22 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@eg.sd.rdtc.ru> To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Subject: Re: SIGUNUSED Message-ID: <20091107072622.GB14078@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <permail-2009110702174980e26a0b00004745-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> References: <20091106221150.GA60707@stack.nl> <permail-2009110702174980e26a0b00004745-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:17:49AM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > as a side not: > our own easyedit does exactly what you said wasn't a good programming style. > ;) check line 554 of contrib/ee/ee.c: > > for (counter = 1; counter < 24; counter++) > signal(counter, SIG_IGN); Easy Editor is contributed software (now lives in contrib/). Such naive signgal handling had already hurt it in the past, f.e. plain ignore of SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU without sanity checks for STDIN_FILENO, STDOUT_FILENO made it CPU hog for 'ee file &' or 'ee </dev/null' in early versions. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091107072622.GB14078>