Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:05:45 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl Message-ID: <010BAA30-EFD0-4B5C-AC94-908130533741@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130904223842.GB82066@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130904223842.GB82066@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sep 5, 2013, at 00:38, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by > default. > > As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: > undefined reference to `powl' > > It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am I > missing something? Do you have a concrete example of a port that gives this result? We do have powl these days, but maybe some configure script is trying to be smart and does not pass -lm to the linker flags... -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlIoLVAACgkQsF6jCi4glqMH3ACgt5SQAeF3O5Xk9yb/3zJB5CJT RCEAn07AyweE15jykE5bwvMePiEaJcmn =7+LA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010BAA30-EFD0-4B5C-AC94-908130533741>