Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 15:49:21 +0100 (BST) From: Nik Clayton <nik@blueberry.co.uk> To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fvwm95 port and process limits / bin/sh problem? Message-ID: <199604231449.PAA11846@plum.blueberry.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <9604231428.AA06233@fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov> from "Sean Kelly" at Apr 23, 96 08:30:53 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >>>>> "Nik" == Nik Clayton <nik@blueberry.co.uk> writes: > > Nik> So, is this an fvwm problem or a sh problem? Anyone more > Nik> qualified than I care to comment? > > Exec xterm & > Exec xbiff -geometry +30+30 & <takes brick> <pounds repeatedly into brain> Ah, I feel much better, I can even tell you precisely why I didn't do that. There's about three sample entries in the .fvwm2rc95 file that *don't* do this, and I can even remember thinking to myself "That's odd, I used to need the "&" for ctwm, I obviously don't for fvwm." and did the same for all my new entries. Oh, the shame. Many thanks. And if at any point in the future you need the blindingly obvious pointed out to you, I'll be happy to return the favour B-) N -- --+=[ Blueberry Hill Blueberry Design ]=+-- --+=[ http://www.blueberry.co.uk/ 1/9 Chelsea Harbour Design Centre, ]=+-- --+=[ WebMaster@blueberry.co.uk London, England, SW10 0XE ]=+-- --+=[ Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't like it. ]ENTP
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604231449.PAA11846>