Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "JULIAN Elischer" <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, chuckr@Glue.umd.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: execve Message-ID: <199605021825.LAA09847@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199605020702.RAA00668@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at May 2, 96 05:02:15 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...] > struct. There would have to be declarations in files[.machine] to tell > config what to emit. E.g., > > kern_imgact.c standard TEXT_SET(execsw_set, aout_execsw) > > This is the same as now except the TEXT_SET() declaration is in > /sys/conf/files instead of in the individual file. The advantages > of this approach is that you're not limited to objects that can be > built as linker sets, and you can see all the possible and configured > objects in central places in the sources (in files[.machine] and in > the generated sources). > what about files that need to have multiple linker sets.. (there are a few) > Bruce >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605021825.LAA09847>