Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:10:37 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The new architecture of pkgng solver Message-ID: <20130725171037.GQ61207@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <51F13DF0.5040209@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:02:08PM +0100, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At the moment I plan to do the following:
>
[...]
> I'll do it if there are no objections.
I bet there won't be any objecttions here :) Please implement what you said that
is all we need !
>
> (And, well, we need to think eventually what to do with share libraries
> dependencies and flexible dependencies, e.g. Depends: libsomething (>1.4))
That is the more problematic thing, pkg add and the ports tree package building
rely on the old form aka full direct dependency
So what I do propose here is:
to provide the 2 kind of dependency old and new format. in the manifest.
Let's say:
Depends:
{ name: ..., formulae: ... }
Deps:
{....}
for the shared library we already have the needed
We also need
requires:
provides:
In the long temps Deps will just be dropped but we need to be able in the ports
tree to match properly the depends and the shared libraries, I don't know yet
how to do that, but I'll dig :)
Would be nice if you solver could take in account local files (aka being used
for pkg add) :)
regards,
Bapt
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlHxXA0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExUYgCfcFoymhxDGa9sAq7P49YvEH7z
nDIAnR87yD/RJXQWzX1FuwrVYYWkFCru
=LicN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130725171037.GQ61207>