Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:10:28 +0200 From: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel Makefile ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel/files Makefile.man Message-ID: <20010820161028.G67741@fling.sanbi.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <3B80D46A.3260.51031F7@localhost>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:12:10AM -0400 References: <200108201241.f7KCfBW45602@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B80D46A.3260.51031F7@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Langille on 2001-08-20 (Mon) at 09:12:10 -0400:
>
> Any reason not to call it Makefile.inc ? I've seen that used many
> times before.
No particular reason, except that I was copying what was done to
security/heimdal in this case and didn't engage the brain to think up a
filename of my own. :-)
I've used Makefile.inc myself in the past, but I don't think there's a
particular rule involved here(?)
One thing, though: I put my Makefile.man in ${FILESDIR} - I thought that was
neater.
-- V
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010820161028.G67741>