Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 20:47:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Network Coordinator <nc@ain.charm.net> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@knobel.gun.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950424204456.24219E-100000@ain.charm.net> In-Reply-To: <199504231819.UAA06506@knobel.GUN.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Apr 1995, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > I'd love to see a stable 2.1, too. I love the idea to bring out an > interim version earlier, because 2.0 had it's flaws. But then I'd > recommend to take the needed time, to make 2.1 as good as you are all > telling us since months. > > I think everybody has the amount of understanding, that a 2.1 quality > release takes a certain amount of time, after adding so much new features. > > So make a better 2.0 release with important bugfixes and a glimpse of 2.1 > and please take the necessary time, to make a real nice 2.1. > > Otherwise it could happen, that we see a 2.1.5, soon, because you made > it in a hurry. > I have to agree. The SNAP releases are great to remind people development is still proceeding, and moving well. Its better to not set a deadline for perfection and let it slide, or worse rush it. If 2.1 can be the new standard in stability for FreeBSD, that will save EVERYONE [including the CoreTeam] a lot of energy because then enhancements only need to be made; one doesn't have to worry about bugs in the underlying code. IMO. -Jerry.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950424204456.24219E-100000>