Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 02:35:07 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Jay Nelson <jdn@acp.qiv.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Suggestion for somebody with a 16MB testbox Message-ID: <19980423023507.17251@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422192202.1211D-100000@acp.qiv.com>; from Jay Nelson on Wed, Apr 22, 1998 at 07:27:55PM -0500 References: <19980421033059.33555@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422192202.1211D-100000@acp.qiv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 at 07:27:55PM -0500, Jay Nelson wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > >I just got some totally wild times for compiling a Linux kernel under > >Linux on a 16MB machine (3 hours for a plain kernel compile). This > > RedHat? > > This is from an IBM 486SX/25 with 16MB ram that was dredged from the > back closet to serve as a 5 user samba print and file server: > > text data bss dec hex > 1044480 69632 87140 1201252 125464 > 3817.34s real 3195.95s user 402.75s system > > For all the lack of horse power, this machine does it's job quite > well. The sales droids don't notice any degredation of service. That sounds like the person that told me he had 3 hours compile times on a P90 was off base. (The 'I got' above was badly formulated.) It still would be neat if we could show that FreeBSD compile a Linux kernel faster than Linux :-) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980423023507.17251>