Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:58:02 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Blaz Zupan <blaz@amis.net> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Message-ID: <20000705135801.P4034@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007042153390.3862-100000@titanic.medinet.si>; from blaz@amis.net on Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM %2B0200 References: <20000704154725.A445@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007042153390.3862-100000@titanic.medinet.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote: > Ok, so let's say my / is 100% full, my /usr is 50% full and my /var is 20% > full. What would the total number tell me? That my file systems are 56.6% > full. That tells me nothing about my root file system running out of space, so > this number is completely useless to me. I have to agree with Sheldon, where > is the use to this number? If you would use the "total" field to monitor diskusage on / then you get what you deserve. Think about doing something like $ df -c/disk0 /disk1 /disk2 ... /diskX To just monitor a cluster of disks. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CHIMES e-mail: billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000705135801.P4034>