Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:44:50 -0700 From: dmorrisn <dmorrisn@u.washington.edu> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, James Love <love@cptech.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement Message-ID: <36158FA2.FB67AC24@u.washington.edu> References: <23307.907176696@time.cdrom.com> <4.1.19981002190913.040f3b60@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19981002202119.040f7c30@mail.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >That is a rhetorical fallacy. (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc -- "After > >this therefore because of this") > > No fallacy at all. It's been proven again and again that emulating another > OS that's more popular provides the ultimate disincentive to developers. > OS/2 is only one recent case in point. I don't see any proof that it's the "ultimate disincentive", nor have you given any. You continue to substitute opinion as fact, which I won't bother quoting below. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36158FA2.FB67AC24>