Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:38:21 +0100 From: gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr To: Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: presenting WOL to the user (was: Re: How to add wake on lan support for your card) Message-ID: <1196332701.474e969d61155@imp.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <20071129101039.GE1513@ted.stsp.lan> References: <20071125174204.GT1463@ted.stsp.lan> <452840.43857.qm@web38013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20071125214850.GY1463@ted.stsp.lan> <200711281613.lASGDSui016057@fire.js.berklix.net> <20071128180618.GC22259@jack.stsp.lan> <474DB348.4060803@errno.com> <20071128184545.GD22259@jack.stsp.lan> <20071129101039.GE1513@ted.stsp.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>: >flags=XXXX<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,WOLMAGIC,WOLLINK,WOLUCAST,WOLBCAST,WOLMCAST> > mtu 1500 > > Would that be better? IMHO, too much info packed in here, making reading difficult. > Has anyone got better ideas? What if there was a single line added, right after status for instance: wol: (magic) unicast link multicast The line mentions all wol options available, and shows the event triggering the wake-up between brackets. Or between <> (whatever). Or even in upper case: wol: MAGIC unicast link gregory
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1196332701.474e969d61155>