Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:20:57 -0800 From: Brian Gardner <openjdk@getsnappy.com> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-java @ freebsd. org" <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: openjdk6 port improvements Message-ID: <10420F74-61AD-4A51-8D11-4F437FD4D88B@getsnappy.com> In-Reply-To: <4B4DE1D8.6000401@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B4B0BBE.2080901@FreeBSD.org> <0DADD574-8B14-416E-AB33-E4CA095AAB25@getsnappy.com> <4B4DE1D8.6000401@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-55--526467190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Please hold off as I'm working on getting b17 committed. I did = integrate your patch into rc2 : ) I'll try and get it commited today. = Here is rc2. Thanks, Brian --Apple-Mail-55--526467190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2010, at 7:08 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Brian Gardner ha scritto: >> Hey Alex, >> The patch looks great. =20 >=20 > So may I commit it? >=20 >> Greg, it looks like Alex has found a way to build the unrestricted = JCE policy files by modifying >> jdk/make/javax/crypto/Makefile so it doesn't have to be manually = downloaded. >> Would you know if this this legal? >=20 > I think it's perfectly legal, there is nothing to agree with for > downloading the unrestricted policy files, they could even be created > from scratch, it's just a matter of safe defaults and the conscious = will > to install them. > The only difference between the downloaded and the compiled versions = is > that the former are digitally signed, but speaking about openjdk = nothing > is signed (JCA/JCE providers, default policy files and so on). >=20 > --=20 > Alex Dupre >=20 --Apple-Mail-55--526467190--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10420F74-61AD-4A51-8D11-4F437FD4D88B>