Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:46:00 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ken Smith <kensmith@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/heimdal/appl/su Makefile.am su.c src/kerberos5/usr.bin/ksu Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5 Makefile pam_krb5.c Message-ID: <42CDA298.3030706@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <1120747581.25352.41.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> References: <200507071416.j67EGcYZ040982@repoman.freebsd.org> <1120747581.25352.41.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ken Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:16 +0000, Ken Smith wrote: > >>kensmith 2005-07-07 14:16:38 UTC >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.2 +10 -5 src/crypto/heimdal/appl/su/Makefile.am >> 1.2 +206 -57 src/crypto/heimdal/appl/su/su.c >> > > > Ok, of the people I ran this by nobody said there needed to be anything > special done other than a straight commit to HEAD but these results look > very wrong. What did I do wrong or not do or ??? > > [ Is this why Peter missed HEAD earlier? :-( ] > If you diff between rev 1.2 and rev 1.1.1.8 (the most recent rev on the vendor branch) you'll see the content revert to what you were probably expecting. What you see in this commit message is the result of taking the file off of the vendor branch and thus the cumulative effect of all of the vendor branch changes that have happened since the very first import. I got fooled by the same thing just now with my gcc commit. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42CDA298.3030706>