Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:02:19 +1100 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs.freebsd@gmail.com> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question about a new Python port Message-ID: <5114DB3B.2090902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5111ACB4.5050506@aldan.algebra.com> References: <5111ACB4.5050506@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/02/2013 12:07 PM, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hello! > > Attached is a shar for a new port -- of the bencode-module > <http://pypi.python.org/pypi/bencode/>. Everything is fairly > straightforward about it, except: > <snip> > 2. The new port also drops an egg -- without even the egg-info file > -- maybe, all such ports should be forced (by bsd.python.mk) to > properly unzip and install the contents? Instead of unzipping at > run-time every time? It works either way, I'm sure, but it seems to > me, the .egg concept was created for the benefit of people, who do > not use anything like the Ports system. > > Thanks for the feedback. Yours, > > -mi I've tried a few things in the past regarding zipped eggs, overriding pyeasyinstall_args with a -Z in the Makefile. I've settled mostly on adding zip_safe=False into setup.py's until such time as we can figure out a clear way forward regarding python packaging. - -- Ta, Koobs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRFNs7AAoJEODRMIXMJgkAL8oIAIrzpdTfzFrfLMjJr7qZZrsS sIeu8LFN+YlyrnMVgLrgF7Pqw890WFapHL1XHeFiGF7EI45arbn+KEJq9r2DH+qi nQrBTAT6rdhuJ5C/XTS1xiT3RJkL3aN4GVawrVrkTWLjstLH1FCN9DT0DDOpXaK6 I6W+9OhPTL9decQA8JMSShzzOb9ny6J+8uq8ZCXywg5BEiJsLxL7jS4uRDG4HWu6 3npI6mD2kNDJgU1ZbLvBiN7qz0GFavXyD6FqhWnM5b+FlxmdvOyvqASdIw6iQBrx A+8iVpBMru+zSya3ubnZY7nhwfaPGlbw536Ib9bpNf6nGJEhmiYrXhElJEgjgPU= =wLvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5114DB3B.2090902>