Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:16:10 +0100 From: Simon L.Nielsen <simon@nitro.dk> To: freebsd-binup@freebsd.org, The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Matt Piechota <piechota@argolis.org>, Jay Keller <jaykeller4@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh) Message-ID: <20011201171617.BFFB237B417@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20011130204022.GA581@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011129145159.00afd050@localhost> <20011130151834.Q40720-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> <20011130204022.GA581@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 30 November 2001 21:40, The Anarcat wrote: > [I should have moved this to -binup some time ago, but here we go.] Where did the thread start? > > I don't know if we'd want to do the entire system this way, but the more > > optional stuff would be nice (named, sendmail, etc). > On the contrary, I think the whole system should be this way. A few > advantages: [CUT] > Any disavantages? Actually IMHO no.. It will take some time to actually split up the base system but I think it will be worth the work. It will make the FreeBSD install much more flexible. Should we see if we can the the binup project moving a bit again? - -- /Simon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8CRBa8kocFXgPTRwRAhBzAKCmCaSkrPmSJYelBQ5cTeCzwYAanACgyBDw Uv8au4L9FT76lEDOt82aIvs= =AitU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011201171617.BFFB237B417>