Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:00:29 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <200007051800.LAA38193@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000705132519.28854D-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000705132519.28854D-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000705132519.28854D-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > > > The headers will always be installed in the right place in > > /usr/include: Makefile's are editable. As far as kernel > > compiles, symlinks can be created in the work directory as > > one possible solution. For example, > > sys/compile/i386/GENERIC/netinet -> ../../../../net/inet. > > This would most likely result in netinet _not_ being split > > up. > > As much as I'd love a complete cleanup of sys/, this cure seems to be > worse than the problem. :-) Take this as another vote to leave net/ as > is, if only to keep the includes in kernel code in sync with includes in > userland code :-). I agree with Robert. Leave the network stuff where it is. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007051800.LAA38193>