Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:31:32 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Cc: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <86oe0kwpcb.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060305161430.54416.qmail@web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:14:30 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <20060305161430.54416.qmail@web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com> writes: > but there's no release yet and of course people will wonder when it will = be as > stable as GNU CVS. I do agree the change would/will make sense though, an= d we > should get rid of GNU readline too. GNU readline is required by other GNU software in the tree (like gdb). We have our own line-editing library (editline) which should be used for all non-GNU software. ISTR that Vinum is the only non-GNU software in our tree that uses readline instead of editline, but this may have changed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86oe0kwpcb.fsf>