Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/7791: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and ipfstat(8) Message-ID: <199907121440.HAA13988@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/7791; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: docs/7791: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and
ipfstat(8)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:01:52 +0930 (CST)
IMO ipf should definitely be in section 8 - after all, it's a command which
can only be run by root. Precedent: ipfw(8)
Kris
-----
"Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,
because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes."
-- Unknown
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907121440.HAA13988>