Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:16:32 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> Subject: Re: Apparent IPv6 bug Message-ID: <4B874B20.2020900@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4B874814.2060908@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B843CC7.1000700@FreeBSD.org> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737E6@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4306ADCA06@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <4B86EF92.6030202@FreeBSD.org> <4B874654.5090900@ibctech.ca> <4B874814.2060908@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010.02.25 23:03, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/25/10 19:56, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Do you want more v6 traffic thrown at the interface for testing? > > Thanks for the offer, but the load I have on it now is the same as what > I had when I got the crashes, so I think it will either work, or it will > not work. :) No sense changing the environment that broke it previously then, lest an artificial benchmark is created. > 19+ hours and counting .... Very, very nice work on the patch Qing, especially the exceptionally short time between issue and repair. Cheers, Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B874B20.2020900>