Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:11:50 -0500 From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang manual page? Message-ID: <20180406011149.GF80088@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20180406005624.GB43998@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20180405223852.GA43120@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAG6CVpUpj7B6ujUSCUkznCBKSGKcuM2czZ=VBgKK%2Bkm5wFwfmg@mail.gmail.com> <20180406001514.GA43793@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAG6CVpWPWCut9fNaPUyQLx9%2B1FiSXgLw6mJXoj6%2BHOmfXWVE9w@mail.gmail.com> <20180406005624.GB43998@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:56:24PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > I never said that you said it was in base. I'm noting that > referring a user to a non-existent manual page is of little > help. In fact, your 7 word response is an affirmation that > the tools supplied in base should be properly documented. It would probably be more useful to file explicit bug reports (or even write a patch) about missing or poor documentation, than to proffer passive-aggressive inquiries on public mailing lists that merely suggest but do not explicitly state that the documentation is deficient. Thanks, Benhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180406011149.GF80088>