Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:05:53 -0500 From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <1C143520-B893-4F43-8F7E-04B021D2EE69@siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <20070225054120.GA47059@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070224213111.GB41434@xor.obsecurity.org> <346a80220702242100i7ec22b5h4b25cc7d20d03e98@mail.gmail.com> <20070225054120.GA47059@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote: > >> What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT >> tree with >> 4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP >> scheduler for >> scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to >> see what >> the performance improvements of the aforementioned patch were >> realized to. >> This would likely be a nice graphics for the SMPng project page, >> BTW... > > There are graphs of this on Jeff's blog, referenced in that URL. > Fixing filedesc locking makes a HUGE difference. Kris, This is fantastic news! Is there an approximate date for when all of these patches are going to hit CVS? Keep up the great work! :) Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 6f43 6564 7020 656f 2e74 4220 7469 6a20 */ /* Code poet / Sysadmin * 636f 656b 2e79 5320 7379 6461 696d 2e6e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 5520 494e 2058 6c73 7565 6874 002e 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * C/C++, Java, Perl, PHP, SQL, XHTML, XML */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1C143520-B893-4F43-8F7E-04B021D2EE69>