Date: Fri, 25 Jul 97 12:15:46 +0200 From: Marko Schuetz <marko@ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difference between a 3C589C and a 3C589D Message-ID: <199707251015.DAA25890@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199707250544.PAA20271@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199707241739.KAA12552@myrtle.bogs.org> <199707250544.PAA20271@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I need 4 pcmcia ethernet cards, for a couple of Toshibas (T1950ct, >> t3400) and two thinkpad 365cd's, all with 2.2.2 systems. >> >> I understand that the 3c589's are probably the best cards to get, but >> have been holding off on getting them because the only ones I've >> seen for sale have been the D's, and there is an apparent problem >> with them (it even says in the release notes that the driver doesn't >> work with the D's). Are you saying that they do work? I have a D-Link 650, they are cheap here compared to other cards (~USD 100) and it works fine. In what respect are the 3c589s considered to be 'best'? Marko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707251015.DAA25890>