Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 22:51:55 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: mike@smith.net.au, tlambert@primenet.com, bde@zeta.org.au, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, bde@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, grog@lemis.com, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: Bruce vandalism again Message-ID: <199712270351.WAA01494@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199712270103.SAA00810@usr04.primenet.com> from Terry Lambert at "Dec 27, 97 01:03:56 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert said: > > FreeBSD makes CSRG code have high performance on x86. NetBSD makes > CSRG code run on many platforms. > > Personally, I'd like CSRG code that had high performance AND ran > on manyy platforms (hence the need for a middle ground). > > Me too. I think that the next flurry of pmap activity will make us have a proper abstraction there. There are a few more VM and VFS performance improvements in progress, and new threading capabilities. Thank goodness we don't have lots of platforms. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712270351.WAA01494>