Date: 15 Aug 2002 00:09:39 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reserve uid:gid 92 for gdm, and add it to the Porter's Handbook Message-ID: <1029384579.37900.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20020815034523.6EEA73E2F@turbine.trit.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 23:45, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > > +++ doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml 2002/08/11 17:45:38 > > @@ -5105,6 +5105,7 @@ > > vpopmail:*:89:89::0:0:User &:/usr/local/vpopmail:/nonexistent > ^^^^^^ <-- This one has a class, expire date, etc. > > smmsp:*:90:90:Sendmail Queue:/nonexistent:/nonexistent > > mailman:*:91:91:Mailman User:/usr/local/mailman:/sbin/nologin > > These two do not. > > > +gdm:*:92:92::0:0:GDM Sandbox:/:/sbin/nologin > > This one does. Ugh. > > I don't know which format would be better here, but they should > definitly be consistent. For now, if you don't feel like fixing this, > just commit your patch (if you haven't already--I'm somewhat behind on > mail); it looks good (and it won't make this particular problem any > worse). I guess this depends on whether or not you use the master.passwd format or the passwd format. Since I'm just a ports committer, it may be better if a doc or src committer do this. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes. Joe > > Dima. > [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9WymDb2iPiv4Uz4cRAt9JAJ9mobOo2jJ6hM7n+kUjFQjDKUxSKgCgrPit 1Zixt9jnKwtHWiF8lnhgBss= =GrWA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1029384579.37900.15.camel>