Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 10:26:32 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Message-ID: <38494EC8.296BB7C1@softweyr.com> References: <199911220127.UAA28430@etinc.com> <Version.32.19991122105556.02b0a4f0@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dennis wrote:
>
> At 07:49 PM 11/21/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dennis wrote:
> >
> >> The nightmare of instability of 3.x continues whilst the braintrust flogs
> >> away at 4.x. Its really a damn shame. And why is 3.x so much slower than
> >> 2.2.8? Will 4.0 be slower yet?
> >
> >Your vagueness and lack of evidence is astounding.
>
> The "evidence" is that 3.x chokes in conditions that 2.2.8 and LINUX dont
> on the exact same hardware. Sorry I dont have time to present a case to
> you.
Exactly WHAT did you think you would accomplish with this message? Let
me summarize what you've said to clarify: "FreeBSD 3.x sucks but I don't
have time tell you where and how it sucks."
My 3.3 machines run until I make world and reboot. They're not heavily
loaded, just doing Gigabit ethernet testing and spidering the entire WWW.
Did you come here asking for help, or just to throw bricks?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38494EC8.296BB7C1>