Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:16:13 +0200 From: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> To: Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal sensitivity problem with if_rum Message-ID: <3a142e750905011716g39ea55f0kd081bfdd55709b37@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49FB55A3.605@entel.upc.edu> References: <49FA2E3F.9050108@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905010655i5e56282eu240e13f2a03dfb02@mail.gmail.com> <49FB55A3.605@entel.upc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/1/09, Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> wrote: > >> There is several places where bbp17 is changed. >> >> > > Editing the code looking for calls to the function rum_bbp_write, > I've been able to find where bbp17 is changed at init. Changing > rum_def_bbp[3] (which is reg 17) to values quite 'big' like 0x10 or 0x14 > doesn't seem to affect its behaviour. > > Lowering it even more (0x01for example) sometimes shows more > reacheable AP's in range; but signal quality still very bad. > Changing RT2573_NOISE_FLOOR doesn't make any change (in terms of signal > quality, which remains the same). > > Any idea if is there anything to change/tune ? There is not just bbp17 to tune there are probably others much more important registers. But as I already mentioned that code is completly missing. -- Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750905011716g39ea55f0kd081bfdd55709b37>