Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 11:36:28 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: fetch-recursive broken? Is this a ports issue or just a problem with the PostgreSQL port? Message-ID: <20061227113628.d148039f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061227161318.GA37308@icarus.home.lan> References: <20061226173950.0412f4bc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061227032400.GD2029@charon.picobyte.net> <20061227102419.0a7cb6a5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061227161318.GA37308@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > > > Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed? Hell, I just > > > > want the distfile on the server so I can install it on other machines. > > > > > > I agree. Perhaps we should automatically set NO_IGNORE and TRYBROKEN for > > > the fetch-recursive target. > > > > I'm getting lost in all the Makefiles trying to cobble together a patch > > to submit. Anyone familiar enough with the ports tree to do so, or at > > least point me in the correct direction? > > Bill, > > This will probably require the expertise of someone who's familiar > with the Mk/bsd.port.mk framework. I can confirm what you're > reporting, though (and have also wondered about it myself...) > > Also, does "make fetch" work (vs. "make fetch-recursive") ? "make fetch" appears to behave identically to "make fetch-recursive". It gives the same error, at least. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061227113628.d148039f.wmoran>