Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:41:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: groff build failure Message-ID: <20101109024131.GA95515@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikzLXFMa%2Br0Mv7S0NU8tBC3%2B-8Jmrt4TLLRqAMh@mail.gmail.com> References: <m2bp60xp6t.wl%randy@psg.com> <20101108190041.GB82268@dragon.NUXI.org> <m2aaljwdas.wl%randy@psg.com> <AANLkTikzLXFMa%2Br0Mv7S0NU8tBC3%2B-8Jmrt4TLLRqAMh@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Tinderbox agrees :(... TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h cvsup.sentex.ca /tinderbox/HEAD/amd64/amd64/supfile Why is the tinderbox still using CVS source trees? To some degree the tinderbox agreeing is meaningless as the report from it does not give the GRN[*] the sources are based on. [*] specifically the output of: svn info | grep 'Last Changed Rev:' -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101109024131.GA95515>