Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:14:41 -1000
From:      Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net>
To:        Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET>
Cc:        FreeBSD-STABLE <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD SMP in 3.4-stable
Message-ID:  <20000310111441.H13914@lava.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003101516580.18763-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003101516580.18763-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:19:20PM -0500, Matt Heckaman wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a production server which at this time is a single PII 400. I wish
> to put in this machine a pair of PII 400 to reduce the load that's on this
> machine. Right now it hovers around 3.00-4.00 load averages, which is just
> too high, it's starting to lag the machine some.
> 
> My questions is, how tested and stable is the SMP in FreeBSD 3.4-stable?

I've been running a dual-processor PIII-500 "Fresh out of the box" from
3.3 CD-ROM release, and as 3.4-stable updated from CVS.  SMP seems very
stable.  

  -- Clifton

-- 
 Clifton Royston  --  LavaNet Systems Architect --  cliftonr@lava.net
      The named which can be named is not the Eternal named.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000310111441.H13914>