Date: 21 Dec 2001 12:00:15 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Andrew McKay <andy@openirc.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: should i be using sgml or xml? Message-ID: <qkheqkuywg.eqk@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112211219001.57948-100000@fluoxetine.lan> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112211219001.57948-100000@fluoxetine.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Andrew McKay <andy@openirc.co.uk> writes:
> My thoughts, for what they are worth, are that I can see a small advantage
> in having XML as a potential doc output format, although I have yet to
> work out what advantage XML has over HTML for this kind of work.
Please excuse me if this is slightly off-topic (I'm not sure if I
understand the topic exactly), but a few months ago I used "tidy" to
convert my small web site to XHTML on the understanding (IIRC) that it
was XML that all recent browsers would render reasonably well (for
simple stuff like I have anyway).
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
The advantage I was after (but haven't used yet) was the ability to
use XML tools and library functions on it.
BTW, re XML in *.html files, it seems legit as long as it's XHTML
(or the W3C version of HTML after XHTML?).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?qkheqkuywg.eqk>